Borrego Solar awarded contract to supply US Department of Defence – PV

The American General Services Administration (GSA) has awarded Borrego Solar Systems a contract that allows it to provide its solar installation services to federal agencies.

The designer, installer, financier of grid-tied solar PV claims its installations are already in demand from the US Department of Defence. The DoD is expected to continue to increase spending on renewable energy, reaching US$10 billion annually by 2030, according to Pike Research. The GSA contract win will help bolster Borrego Solar’s growing federal portfolio, which includes a nearly 1MW solar project at the Point Loma Navy Base in San Diego bay and a 3.4 MW project at Edwards Air Force Base.

Borrego Solar CEO Mike Hall said, “Solar energy is a smart investment for the federal government, and we look forward to helping more agencies reduce their energy consumption and achieve energy independence through our financing, design and installation services.”
 

Article source: http://www.pv-tech.org/news/borrego_solar_awarded_contract_to_supply_us_department_of_defence

Cheap Natural Gas Won’t Kill Renewable Energy growth (3 Reasons Why)

 
I’ll be the first to admit that cheap natural gas prices are one of the biggest short-term threats to deployment of renewable energy in the U.S. today. With a glut of gas dropping prices to historic lows, the competitiveness of technologies like wind, solar PV, and solar hot water are facing significant challenges.

But here’s the important thing to remember: The industry is being challenged, not beaten. Amidst all the hand wringing over what cheap natural gas will do to investment in renewables, we often lose sight of the fact that the cost and price of renewable energy technologies are still chasing the record price drops in natural gas. When the price of natural gas starts to climb back up (according to many estimates, it will fairly soon), renewables will be more competitive than ever.

Over the next couple of years, I believe that the age-old idiom will again be proven true: “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”

Below are my top three reasons why natural gas won’t be the death of renewables.

1. Cheap gas won’t stay “cheap” for too much longer

cheap natural gas won't last

Source: Slate.com

It’s often said that America has a 100-year supply of natural gas. However, those figures, which are based on estimates from the Potential Gas Committee, factor in “proved” reserves, “possible” reserves and “speculative” reserves. If we narrow these figures down to proven, technically-exploitable resources based upon current natural gas consumption rates, more cautious estimates put our supply at roughly 11-21 years.

With mature gas plays like the Barnett Shale and Marcellus Shale in decline or appearing to be nearing a peak, and drillers scaling back on operations because it’s not profitable to drill with such low prices, a growing number of analysts are questioning whether the U.S. gas industry is approaching peak production. Petroleum Geologist Arthur E. Berman recently wrote about the decline rates in conventional and unconventional gas fields at the Oil Drum:

“This development may expose the notion of long-term natural gas abundance and cheap gas as an illusion. The good news is that this adjustment will lead to higher gas prices in a future less distant than most believe. Higher prices coupled with greater discipline in drilling will allow operators to earn a suitable return and offer the best opportunity for supply to grow to meet future needs.”

In its latest Annual Energy Outlook, the U.S Energy Information Administration also cut estimates of unproved technically recoverable resources by 42%. As energy analyst Chris Nelder recently wrote: “Everything you know about shale gas is wrong.”

2. Renewable energy is challenged, but still competitive

Source: Institute for Local Self Reliance, using data from Lazard

Over the years, the conversation around gas has changed dramatically in renewable energy circles. For example, up until 2008 when gas prices were at their peak and wind development was soaring, the industry’s message was simple: We’re a far more cost-effective, reliable investment than gas.

But the tide turned in 2009, when gas prices started their precipitous drop. I remember the American Wind Energy Association’s annual conference in 2010, when shale gas dominated the CEO roundtable discussion. “Our single biggest challenge is improving technologies to compete with these low prices,” said one executive.

The industry clearly took the challenge seriously. Today, due to bigger turbines, more reliable equipment and better materials, the cost of wind has dropped to record lows. In fact, some developers are even signing long-term power purchase agreements in the 3 cents a kilowatt-hour range. And last fall, Bloomberg New Energy Finance projected that wind would be “fully competitive with energy produced from combined-cycle gas turbines by 2016″ under fair wind conditions.

The same technological improvements and maturation in project development in wind are driving down the cost of solar PV as well. For example, in California, solar developers have signed contracts for power below the projected price of natural gas from a 500-MW combined cycle power plant. (That projection does include a carbon price).

These trends are driving record levels of interest from investors. In 2011, for the first time ever, global investments in renewable energy surpassed investments in fossil fuels.

The bottom line: the price of renewable energy continues to come down while the projected price of natural gas is only expected to rise.

We do have to be realistic about the situation: assuming gas prices stay near record low levels for a long period of time — which they likely won’t — renewables deployment won’t grow at the rate we need it to. But if you look at the where large-scale renewables stack up with the cost of energy from peaking gas plants and combined cycle plants (chart above), you can see that the industry is still nipping at the heels of gas — even with a “revolution” underway in accessing shale resources. That’s something that can’t be ignored.

3. Natural gas is a fossil fuel and still contributes to global warming

Source: Nature

When considering our energy investment choices, it’s important for us to remember why we want renewable energy in the first place. Sure, it’s a domestic resource that empowers local communities, encourages entrepreneurial innovation, and spurs new types of economic development. But ultimately, renewables are an important tool for helping us reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat global warming. We should never lose sight of this environmental context.

So while gas will be an important short-term tool to knock old coal plants out of the energy mix and provide a source of back up for intermittent renewables, the global warming challenge will eventually present limits to our investments in natural gas, if not this decade, then certain in the 2020s.

As we’ve pointed out numerous times, without a price on carbon, natural gas is not a bridge fuel — it is a bridge to nowhere. Under the International Energy Agency’s “Golden Age of Gas” scenario that assumes an aggressive build-out of “clean” natural gas plants, we would still see global temperatures rise 6° Fahrenheit.

While the science is still far from settled on the life-cycle emissions issue, measured emissions in some cases are well above what drillers claim (see chart above).

Even if natural gas is cleaner than coal, it is still a fossil fuel. When we get serious about addressing global warming and put a price on greenhouse gas emissions, the current economic advantages of natural gas are diminished or disappear. Last October, three center-right economists — Nicholas Z. Muller, Robert Mendelsohn, and William Nordhaus — found that with a carbon price of $27 per ton, the cost of environmental and health damages from natural gas were greater than the resource’s added value to society.

In other words, natural gas isn’t nearly as inexpensive as current prices suggest (see also “Economics Stunner: Natural Gas Damage Larger Than Its Value Added For Even Low CO2 Prices“).

Writing to 415 of the world’s biggest global warming polluters this week, global investors representing $10 trillion put it best:

“The external costs of greenhouse gas emissions will become internalized into company cash flows and profitability,” Paul Abberley, chief executive officer at Aviva Investors in London said in the statement today. ‘‘Managing greenhouse gas emissions is therefore essential to delivering sustainable shareholder returns.’’

Natural gas certainly has a role to play in this long, complicated energy transition — assuming we properly value its environmental impact. But if we listen to these forward-thinking global investors and take their call for a low-carbon strategy seriously, renewables, efficiency and demand response will not be swept aside, no matter what the short-term challenges are.

This article was originally posted on Climate Progress and has been republished with permission.


jQuery(‘.nrelate_default’).removeClass(‘nrelate_default’);

Repost this article

Article source: http://cleantechnica.com/2012/02/22/cheap-natural-gas-wont-kill-renewable-energy-growth-3-reasons-why/

Solar energy still makes sense for poultry sector

Investing in solar PV installations is a “no-brainer” for poultry producers, despite ongoing cuts in government support, according to NFU chief renewables adviser Jonathan Scurlock.

“How would you like to invest about £1m in solar energy and get a return on your capital of 6-7% before any kind of government subsidy? That’s how fast this particular sector is moving,” he told the recent poultry “breakout session” at the NFU Conference in Birmingham.

A megawatt of solar would produce about 800 MWhr of electricity a year, he told the conference. “That’s worth, if you’re buying it at 10p a unit, about £80,000 if you displace all of your electricity. The likelihood is that there will be about a 75% match between your use and what the solar system can provide. So if you get a decent power purchase agreement on your exported electricity and, say, 75% you use yourself, you’re still going to be displacing or making about £70,000 on a £1m investment. And that’s before any government subsidy.


“So, even though the government is reducing the Feed-in Tariffs, I think these kind of investments for your businesses could easily give you 10% back on your money.”

Having said that, there was no doubt the FiT budget was overspent and the government was committed to further cuts. Poultry producers needed to be aware of two key dates. The first was 3 March, the date from which newly-registered projects would definitely be subject to reduced FiTs, though this could be backdated to earlier projects if the government won an ongoing appeal in the Supreme Court.

The other date was 1 April, from when the cuts would be implemented. “We’ve got some significant worries there because there will be a requirement, at least on domestic installations, to have some sort of energy performance certificate on the building to which the solar PV unit is attached,” said Mr Scurlock. “We don’t yet know how this is going to be applied in the agricultural sector.”

NFU members had also reported problems with getting grid connections and with planning permission, and there was a need for more transparency and guidance on both.

Despite these hurdles, solar energy continued to be a viable option for supplying the electricity needed to heat young chicks and then ventilate the adult birds. With rising electricity prices and declining costs of technology “this is the sort of thing that ought to be an absolute no-brainer, simply because it won’t require any government subsidy by the end of this decade”.

* A new Farm Energy Service has been launched by the NFU in association with renewable specialists Fischer German and contract experts Farm Energy. The initiative offers independent advice and guidance for NFU members on a range of energy issues including solar panels, wind energy, grid connections and energy contracts. It will also provide assistance with legal queries, planning, finance and insurance. Benefits include a free initial survey, access to an energy contract finder service and a discounted fee structure.


Read more news from the NFU Conference on our dedicated page.

Article source: http://www.fwi.co.uk/Articles/22/02/2012/131575/Solar-energy-still-makes-sense-for-poultry-sector.htm

SmartTrak deploys tracking system for solar PV plants

SmartTrak Solar, a manufacturer of solar tracking systems, has announced that it has successfully installed their indigenously developed tracking system for a grid connected project located near Anantapur in Andhra Pradesh.

It is in discussions with several other developers to deploy this technology solution for other projects.

“The SmartTrak systems help save on energy and thereby also on the overall cost of deployment for the developer. The savings could be as high as 25 per cent, when a solar tracking system is installed as opposed to fixed panel systems,” according to Mr Raghuram Kondubhatla, Managing Director of SmartTrak.

Addressing a press conference here along with Mr Bhagwan Reddy Gnanapa, Chief Executive Officer of SmartTrak, Mr Raghuram said they were in discussions with developers with total capacity of 20 MW for deployment of these solutions. The company had successfully deployed them and tested at Anantapur project for Solarsis and at Chaitanya Bharati Instutute of Technology.

The tracking system helps harness the full potential of solar power.

A cost analysis of a five MW solar PV unit with 80 lakh units of output requires about Rs 47.5 crore and a tracking system based solar PV plant can achieve this output by setting up a 4 MW plant with an outlay of Rs 38 crore.

The company is seeking to secure a patent for this, he said.

Smaller installation

“The company believes that this tracking system can be used effectively even for smaller installation such as row housing and small townships.

By deploying these, a group of house owners could look beyond mere water heating as this also serves as a source of energy to manage basic lighting,” they said.

vrishi@thehindu.co.in

Article source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/economy/article2920492.ece?homepage=true&ref=wl_home

Europe Solar Utility sells 3.7MW of UK PV systems

Europe Solar Utility sells 3.7MW of UK PV systems

21 Feb 2012

Photovoltaic (PV) project developer Europe Solar Utility (ESU) has completed the sale of 3.7MW of PV assets to Thames Water.

The three facilities are located on land near London, which is already owned by Thames Water.

Construction of the plants was financed by ESU with the first stage of construction completed before 1 August last year, making the projects eligible for the old feed-in tariff (FIT) rate of 30.7 pence per kilowatt hour.

Patrick Charignon, CEO of ESU, said, ‘The successful sale of our Thames Water project validates our strategy of financing and implementing industrial scale pre-construction solar PV plants and selling the operational assets on to long-term financial and industrial investors. We have shown that we can efficiently put capital to work during the construction phase to bring the projects of this type to completion quickly and even to the very tight deadlines imposed by the UK’s changing regulatory environment.

‘Future projects of this scale have been put in doubt by the UK government’s proposed cut to the FIT rate. However, utilities may still gain the benefits of solar PV through installations built around power purchase agreements of the type used in this project that offer long-term price certainty in environment of rising energy prices.’

Copyright © 2012 NewNet

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Article source: http://www.newenergyworldnetwork.com/investor-news/renewable-energy-news/by-technology/solar/europe-solar-utility-sells-3-7mw-of-uk-pv-systems.html

Wind power and solar energy in Pakistan

Samir Hoodbhoy was privileged to get his undergraduate education at Harvard University in the early ’60s when John F. Kennedy was President of the USA and the post World War II mindset was for reconstruction and addressing wrongs within the society. He was also fortunate to witness and participate in the technology breakthroughs in robotics systems, semi-conductors and the first mobile cellular system developed.

In Pakistan, he initiated and successfully directed the creation of the Central Design Bureau of Pakistan Steel Mills in 1988-92. In those days, there was a dearth of skilled work force in electronics, and software. He has had the opportunity to lay the groundwork for three leading educational institutions in the field of ICT and been on the Board of Advisors of several other civic and educational organizations.

Since that period, Data Communication and Control (Pvt.) Ltd., which was founded by him in 1992, has been actively developing simulators for industry and the defense services. They rely on the intellectual strengths of youth who he believes have the capacity of accomplishing wonderful results when given the opportunity and guided properly. This is in spite of the adverse environment for research and development activities.

He also firmly believes that the judicious application of science and technology is essential for addressing the overwhelming problems of Pakistan. Developing a culture of “seeking the truth” and promoting the scientific approach to problem solving is his passion.

His current interests include urban planning, building management systems, and developing products and systems for the smart grid and the alternate energy sector.

PAGE: Your views about potential for alternate energy particularly hydrokinetic energy and solar thermal power in Pakistan.

Samir Hoodbhoy: The potential of energy alternatives based on renewable sources of energy is limited only by our ability to innovate, organize, and educate. Hydrokinetic and solar thermal are the two most promising alternate renewable energy solutions that can be used to reduce Pakistan’s rising $10 billion annual fuel imports and energy deficits while at the same time preserve the environment by not adding to the hazards of increased carbon gases emissions that are caused by the use of furnace oil and natural gas.

SOLAR ENERGY

Pakistan’s geography is most conducive to the exploitation of solar energy as it is the 6th most fortunate country in the world in terms of solar irradiance and where sunshine availability is 8-10 hours per day over much of the plains of Sindh, Balochistan and Southern Punjab.

Solar energy intensity in the sunbelt of Pakistan is approximately 1,800-2,200 KWh per square meter per day which is most favorable for the exploitation of solar energy. The potential capacity for installation of solar photovoltaic power by some estimates is 1,600 GW, which is 40 times greater than present consumption. Based on a range of currently possible conversion efficiencies an area of one sq km has the potential to produce 40-55 M Watts of power and can generate revenue conservatively estimated at one billion rupees per month at current average tariffs of Rs10 per kW-hr. Since solar power is available only during times of sunshine, it can at most meet up to 30 per cent of daily consumption without the need for energy storage such as in underground salt deposits.

The wasteland and desert of Thar, Balochistan and lower Sindh are prime contenders for the establishment of large solar farms with capacities of generating more than 250 gigawatts of electrical power to meet the energy shortfall over the coming decades.

The question of what solar-based technology is most appropriate depends on several factors. Photovoltaic cells with an efficiency of 18-25 per cent are most suitable in localized production of electricity where the solar panels are mounted in proximity of the end user. This also has the advantage of minimizing transmission losses that are associated with conventional utility power generating systems. As prices of photovoltaic tumble downwards, panels with generation capacities of 1 – 100 kWatts will become an increasingly common sight on unattended rooftop terraces of individual homes and high-rise buildings, parking lots and open spaces in both the urban as well as rural countryside. The solar feed-in tariff, which is the price of solar-generated electricity, could drop below 12.5 cents for each kilowatt-hour (kWh) by 2015, equal to conventional coal-fired electricity by that time. This indeed would provide a major boost to using solar farms in Pakistan as well as the region.

Solar panels require additional components such as battery storage units, inverters, and sun trackers that increase the cost of a completely installed system for domestic and commercial users. Many larger efficient solar panels have automated sun trackers that follow the sun during the day and the seasons for maximizing the incident angle of the sun’s rays. However, with abundance of low paid semi-skilled labor, the sun trackers, in certain situations can periodically be positioned manually to point in direction of the sun.

Because solar panels inherently produce DC voltage, they require a DC-AC voltage inverter to step up to 220 volts that is necessary for connecting to the ordinary household in Pakistan. Moreover, in the forthcoming years, more appliances will operate on DC voltage, including computers, TV displays, mobile phones and LED lighting bulbs; this will preempt the need for such a converter thus further driving down the cost of P-V solar panel systems.

CONCENTRATED SOLAR POWER CSP

Concentrated Solar Power Thermal technology provides an alternative to P-V cells; has conversion efficiencies of 30 per cent and is a strong contender for larger generating plants. CSP uses parabolic troughs or reflecting mirrors onto solar collectors that concentrate the energy for generating steam or that focuses sunlight onto P-V solar cells thereby increasing efficiency of the energy conversion process.

CSP can also be used for preheating of the steam in a modified conventional thermal power plant. This design modification builds on the resources and facilities of an existing furnace oil, gas fired, or co-generation power plant and enables savings on the fuel needed for steam generation. The deserts of Tharparkar and Balochistan have the potential for producing several hundreds of GWatts power. If the energy is stored in salt dunes, this energy would be available 24 hrs, 7 days throughout the year and eliminate the need for expendable fuels.

Internationally, other countries including the USA, Spain, and Israel have initiated major solar thermal power projects with power generation capacities exceeding 100 mWatts. The US has designated significant portions of the wastelands in the state of Nevada and New Mexico for power generation with CSP. Major plans are underway by the European Union to exploit this technology along with host countries Algeria and Morocco. The EC countries expect to generate 15 per cent of their total energy needs with CSP by tapping into the burning sands of the Sahara desert and transmitting the electricity into the European mainland over thousands of miles of high voltage transmission lines. In India, entrepreneurs and the utilities in India plan to generate more than 20 GWatts from the Thar Desert over the next decade.

Within India’s solar energy sector, several mega projects are on the drawing boards and a 35,000 km2 area of the Thar desert is being set aside for solar power projects, sufficient to generate 700 to 2,100 Gwatts. Under the plan, solar-powered equipment and applications would be mandatory in all government buildings including hospitals and hotels.

HYDROKINETIC ENERGY

Hydrokinetic technology extracts the kinetic power from fast flowing water for electricity production. In contrast with politically sensitive and capital-intensive hydro-electric dams, hydrokinetics does not require disturbing the flow of river or causing major dislocations of habitat for the creation of water reservoirs. Water bodies including scores of points along the Indus River, the rapid flowing Kabul and Swat rivers, the irrigation canals of Punjab and Sindh, and the tidal currents of the Arabian Sea hold much untapped potential for hydrokinetic power generation.

In most of the glacier fed mountain streams of Pakistan, the 16,000 MW potential for generating electricity from the fast moving streams is untapped due to difficulties of physical accessibility and to the absence of a power grid network. However, local generation from smaller mini-hydel projects producing 50-500 kW through inexpensive generating units and serving small communities is increasingly being exploited in the mountainous regions. In the plains with slower moving river flow rates but with considerably greater volume of flow, the potential is even greater.

Cross flow turbines inserted in the path of rivers and streams have exciting possibilities but the technological challenges are equally daunting. These include production of efficient, low cost turbines, issues related to placement of the prime movers within the water body, of mechanical stability and mooring, ease of repairs and of bringing the power lines to the consumers. A typical individual micro hydrokinetic turbine can generate from five to 25 kW of power.

Clusters of these turbines can be combined to produce 50-500 kWatts. Their potential is greatest at fast flowing rivers and canals such as along the Ghazi Barotha canal and Hub canal where stream velocity exceeds three meters per sec, and at the foot discharge of existing hydroelectric barrages and dams.

Sites such as along the Kabul River and Swat River have a maximum flow rate of 4 to 5 m/s, with a minimum flow rate of 1.5 m/s. Other than the rivers, there are various sites located along Jinnah, Chashma, Taunsa, and Guddu barrages that have individual capacities of generating about 10 MW of electricity using hydrokinetic energy extraction methods. The power generated in many cases would be adequate for powering a riverside garrison town, a farming community or other population centers that are not connected to the national power grid or those who suffer from incessant load shedding.

In the south, tidal power projects may be used to power localities and small-scale industries located by the sea. An efficient hydrokinetic turbine requires a minimum water current of 2 knots (1.028 m/s) for propelling the blades and generating electricity. Some areas of high potential for application of hydrokinetic technology are the entrance of Port Muhammad Bin Qasim can generate around 34 MW of electricity through tidal energy. Other prominent sites where this technology can be installed are Gwadar, Pasni and Karachi coastal areas.

PAGE: IT IS SAID THAT UNDER THE SOLAR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAM OF AEDB, OVER 7,800 REMOTE VILLAGES WILL BE ELECTRIFIED USING SOLAR HOME SYSTEMS. WHAT ARE YOUR COMMENTS?

SAMIR HOODBHOY: For those remote villages that are beyond the national power transmission grid scheme to be integrated with the rest of the country and brought into the 21st century, solar home systems is a most viable option and will be administered under the rural electrification program. The program has been estimated to cost $500 million. One solar household system (SHS) has been assigned a Solar PV installed capacity of 50-120 Watts. 1,000,000 households in the 8,000 villages would generate a demand of 100 MW of solar PV power. This would also mean, a 125 kW load per village. At a rate of 4 USD per watt for PV capital costs, it adds up to $400 million for generation and a $100 million extra for supplementary costs. Admittedly, these cost estimates appear to be reasonable. The villages are selected by the provincial governments through a list of villages provided by water and power development authority (WAPDA).

As most of the rural communities being targeted depend on agriculture for their subsistence and are in water scarce regions, there is an overwhelming demand for the use of solar-fired tube wells of individual capacities of 5-7 HP. Such tube wells if produced locally at affordable costs and using drip irrigation techniques could spark a major breakthrough in the development cycle of the rural countryside. Among the other ancillary benefits of the solar home systems is generating sufficient electricity for battery chargers needed for mobile cell communication and to introduce satellite TV reception that would indeed end the centuries old isolation of these communities.

PAGE: BALOCHISTAN HAS AVERAGE DAILY GLOBAL INSULATION OF 19 TO 20 MILLION JOULES/M2 A DAY WITH ANNUAL MEAN SUNSHINE DURATION OF 8 TO 8.5 HOURS. THE COASTAL AREA OF BALOCHISTAN HAS ENOUGH WIND SPEED TO HELP GENERATE ELECTRICITY. WHAT ARE YOUR VIEWS?

SAMIR HOODBHOY: With a level of solar irradiance of 19 million joules per sq meter extended over more than 250,000 sq kms of the plains and desert of Balochistan, the potential for solar power exceeds 25,000 GWatts. Even if one per cent of this land mass was apportioned for solar energy farming, this represents a potential generation of 250 GWatts which is 12 times greater than the present installed generating capacity of 20 GWatts in Pakistan. Estimates of the availability of wind potential vary.

According to the Alternate Energy Development Board (AEDB), Nokkundi in the Chagai district is one of the world’s most ideal wind corridors where wind speed is almost constantly 12.5 per cent higher than the average required for energy generation. Other parts of the wind corridor includes a 300-kilometre-long area with wide open spaces from Dalbandin to Taftan, a town on the border of Iran, Gharo to Keti Bandar in Thatta district of the Sindh province which is a 60 km long and 170 km deep corridor and estimated to have a power generation potential of 50,000 MW. Similar is the case of Lasbella district of Balochistan province, where wind energy at a sustainable speed, good for power generation is available with little variation in the seasons (five meters per second in winter and eight meters per second in the summer).

Many parts of Balochistan province are barren either due to shortage of surface water or due to non-availability of power. The population in this area is scattered and spread over large remote areas, which render the use of oil engines and transmission costs of centralized power generating stations uneconomical. Whereas the potential for wind generation is attractive, current unsettled political and socioeconomic conditions are disincentives for the construction of large wind turbines and solar farms with capacities of one mWatt. Under settled conditions, this region could easily become an attractive carbon gas free energy producing center within Pakistan. Mini wind farming projects (1-50 kWatts) along with small solar farms scattered over remote inaccessible areas presents an attractive proposition that would help mitigate the localized needs of providing electricity for lighting, communications and for pumping water with tube wells for irrigation and domestic consumption.

Larger wind power and solar power farms with individual production capacity of 0.5-500 MW developed along the wind corridors and the desert hinterland of Balochistan, respectively, have the capacity to radically alter the socioeconomic plight of Pakistan by resuscitating both the agricultural and industrial sectors.

PAGE: WHAT ARE YOUR VIEWS ON FOREIGN INVESTMENTS IN ALTERNATE ENERGY SECTOR?

SAMIR HOODBHOY: Foreign investments in the alternate energy sector should be welcomed and pursued but mainly as a seeding mechanism for rapid development of the alternate energy sector. In view of the very large demand and potential for power in the alternate energy sector, it is neither affordable nor feasible for foreign capital to finance the entire requirements.

Apart from the technology content, investment in the power sector includes provision of land and labor for installation, operations and maintenance. This part is a local resource. The land should be allocated from government holdings and labor skills developed in the local universities and technical institutions. Furthermore, the technologies, if imported, should be licensed and paid for. There is no such thing as a free lunch.

PAGE: PAKISTAN IS SEVERAL YEARS BEHIND ITS CONTEMPORARIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE TO FABRICATE TURBINES, PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS, AND THE CAPABILITY TO BUILD WHAT IS THE NEXT GENERATION OF POWER GENERATION. IT SHOULD LOOK TO PRODUCE LED LIGHTS RATHER THAN INVESTING IN COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMPS (CFLS) MANUFACTURING. WHAT DO YOU SAY?

SAMIR HOODBHOY: Yes indeed. The Pakistan’s industrial infrastructure is far behind the competition; this is primarily due to the educational setup in the vocational and centers of higher education where innovation and creativity is sacrificed in favor of rote learning. The ‘scientific method’ has also been passed over with the preference given by business and industry to becoming operators and consumers of technology gadgets instead of designers and producers.

Alternate energy solutions with solar, wind power, biogas, geothermal, hydrokinetic and mini- hydel technologies are a relatively new phenomena but their scientific basis is well established since past several decades. It would be appropriate for the engineering curriculum in the universities to be updated on certain key disciplines that are useful for providing solutions. Furthermore, the universities should be encouraged to pursue research and development activities based on long term goal oriented program. For example, turbine design and manufacturing requires a greater understanding of CAD/CAM/CAE (Computer aided Design, Manufacturing and Engineering), CFD Computational Fluid Dynamics.

The integration and engineering of complete systems built from component modules is often viable and preferred for accelerating engineering solutions. Of course, the world is now a global village; it is often more appropriate to purchase these materials or license the processes rather than reinvent from scratch or build all aspects. For example, in the case of solar farms, it would be more expedient to import the photovoltaic cells, which are produced in very high volume at very competitive prices and assemble the solar panels locally. Sun trackers and power trackers could be designed and fabricated locally whereas high performance storage batteries may be imported.

Yes, Light Emitting Diodes represent a drastic reduction of 90 percent of energy required for lighting. High illumination bulbs for residential and commercial lighting require as little as 10-20 Watts. Assemblies of LEDs are labor intensive and should be undertaken locally. Low power LEDs requiring 6-12 volts of DC are ideal loads that can be powered from solar arrays or mini-wind mills directly thus resulting in power savings. When combined with a solar P-V sensor and a storage battery, LED bulbs are being used for overhead street lighting without recourse to power from the utility companies. Compact fluorescent lamps will soon face the fate of the horse and carriage.


www.pakistaneconomist.com/

Article source: http://www.evwind.es/noticias.php?id_not=16771

Eden Project installs UK’s first employee-owned solar plant

A new 50 kilowatt PV array at the Eden Project has just become the UK’s first employee owned renewables installation. Ebico, the Witney-based social enterprise that is the UK’s only not-for-profit electricity supplier, lent money to a new company that put 200 panels on the roofs of some of Eden’s storage buildings. Employees are now able to buy shares in the new business and the proceeds of this unique offer will be used to pay back Ebico. Savers putting in as little as £200 each will share in the feed-in tariff income for the next 25 years. Returns are projected to be over 10% per year for small investors.

Feed-in tariffs, particularly for solar PV, have been attacked because they subsidise richer householders at the expense of the rest of the population. The aim at Eden has been to show that renewables can also be of financial benefit to people not able to afford to put PV on their own roofs. I helped structure this deal and wrote the document that offers the shares to employees.

The recent changes in the solar PV tariffs mean that installation such as the one at Eden are less attractive to small investors. Other technologies, such as wind and anaerobic digestion, are now much more appropriate for employee or community financing. The returns to investors can be at least as high as we project for savers buying shares in the PV array at Eden.

The aims of feed-in tariffs are to encourage smaller renewable energy installations, push down the cost of new low-carbon technologies and, third, to assist in the decentralisation of electricity supply. The solar PV tariffs worked extraordinarily well at building up an efficient and competitive base of installers and reducing the price of household installations by about 50% in the space of two years. Anybody wanting an array on the roof of their house in 2009 would have got a quote of about £5,000 per kilowatt. Today, that price can be below £2,500 for a larger installation. There is no doubt that the PV tariffs successfully met the first two of the three aims that the government had for the tariffs.

What about the third objective- the decentralisation of electricity supply? The evidence here is mixed. Although hundreds of thousands of household PV installations have taken place, the impact on the electricity supply of the UK has been of the order of 0.1%. Wind turbines owned by community companies must surely be the next step. One 500 kilowatt wind turbine, the sort of size that might sit on a small hill at the edge of a town, can typically provide the same power output as three or four hundred domestic PV installations or twenty five times as much as the Eden array (the 50 kW Eden array will deliver about 47,000 kilowatt hours a year, or just under 1,000 kilowatt hours per kilowatt capacity. A well sited wind turbine will deliver a ‘capacity factor’ of over twice as much.)

The striking thing about community ownership of wind turbines is that local resistance disappears if people have a financial stake in their success. One wonderful Dutch study even showed that people ceased to hear the swishing noise of the blades if they had some ownership of the wind farm. Community ownership is the only way we are ever going to see the UK use its under-exploited resources of onshore wind. Today, the costs of the subsidies for renewable energy are borne by everybody but the benefits are largely flowing to the large electricity companies and richer householders. Larger scale community energy installations, such as the one at Eden, can achieve rapid growth of low carbon energy sources and also remove the regressive element in the feed-in tariffs.

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/feb/22/eden-project-employee-solar-plant?newsfeed=true

CLIMATE SPECTATOR: Drifting solar flagships

Climate Spectator

It gave me little satisfaction to hear a prediction I made in April 2011 – that the selected Solar Flagship projects would fail to materialise – had proven correct (see page 35 of the Grattan Institute report, Learning the Hard Way – Detailed Analysis). Now all the wrong conclusions are being made about the reasons behind the current predicament, which tragically leaves us on the same path with the Clean Energy Finance Corporation.

Those opposed to action on climate change are crowing about how a lack of backers for the Moree Solar PV Farm and the Queensland Solar Dawn project proves solar technology is a dud. On the other side, the Greens are blaming the people involved, suggesting energy minister Martin Ferguson didn’t want Solar Flagships to succeed.

The reality is completely different. This is not a failure due to the product (solar), nor the people involved. It is due to a poor process. Solar Flagships’ primary problem is that it committed funding to individual projects well in advance of their construction via a tender selection process. Solar Flagships has encountered the same problems that have dogged just about every other emission reduction program that employed grant tendering to allocate funding. The report I co-authored, Learning the Hard Way, explains this sorry history in excruciating detail.

A tender, on face value, seems like a perfectly valid, competitive mechanism for allocating government money. But for funding carbon abatement projects it involves considerable complexity, which regularly means winning bids fail to materialise into operational projects.

This is because it is very difficult for businesses to develop well-informed bids as:

1. Bidders will probably have only done preliminary work in preparing their project. After all you’re not going to spend large sums of money on lawyers, engineers and environmental consultants until you’re confident there’s demand for your product. This demand does not exist for most low carbon electricity projects until they manage to win the tender.

2. Several years are likely to transpire between the time the bid is submitted and the date the project becomes operational. In the meantime there’s significant room for prediction errors across a wide range of important factors influencing costs and revenue, such as the value of the Australian dollar and the price of steel, glass, solar panels and electricity.

3. The selection process run by government is infrequent (once a year at best), not transparent (all bids are confidential) and highly subjective. This makes it difficult to assess how your bid is likely to fare relative to competitors and can tend to encourage over-optimistic bidding.

To top it all off, once the tender process is completed the winning bidders face absolutely no competition to get their project built before anyone else, and no penalty if they fail to deliver. In the case of the Howard government’s Low Emission Technology Demonstration Program, we are still waiting on HRL and Silex Systems to confirm whether they will construct projects selected in a tender round held in 2005. Thankfully Solar Flagships improved on this one aspect by placing a deadline on winning bidders to commit to construction, although this deadline has been extended for Solar Dawn.

There is little reason why government even needs to commit funding to individual projects before they are built. The private sector has shown a ready willingness to finance solar, bioenergy, geothermal and wind projects, in many cases at significant scale, without government providing money up front. Instead these projects have been built on the basis of government support provided per unit of electricity generated. If they don’t produce electricity they don’t get a cent of support and it’s a matter of first-in best-dressed. This can work through government setting mandated targets for a given quantity of renewable electricity (such as the Australian Renewable Energy Target) or mandated prices (Germany’s feed-in tariffs). Support should ideally be designed using a combination of both price and quantity to prevent boom-bust cycles (as occurs with Germany’s feed-in tariff program).

This leads to my next concern – the Clean Energy Finance Corporation. The government has said that the CEFC will use loans and equity investments to support renewable energy. This will encounter exactly the same problems as past grant tendering programs as it involves selecting individual projects and companies to fund, well in advance of them delivering any electricity. That it will employ merchant bankers to allocate the money does nothing to reassure me that the results will be any different to the past.

I will make a bold prediction: of the $5 billion allocated to the CEFC to support renewable energy, very little will lead to any electricity being generated. I am prepared to stand by this prediction no matter what the outcome of the next federal election. A $5 billion injection could do a lot of good for the renewables sector in Australia, but I can’t see this happening based on the current terms of reference for the CEFC.

Article source: http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/climate-solar-flagships-mistakes-deadline-governme-pd20120222-RPVUG?opendocument&src=rss

Plans in place to integrate organic solar panels into building façades

This new Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) solution will combine energy harvesting to reduce a building’s carbon footprint with a discrete, aesthetically pleasing, visual appearance.

Heliatek’s award winning organic photovoltaic (OPV) technology is ideally suited to this application, because it is ultra-light, ultra-thin, and ultra-powerful, as it harvests the sun’s energy at peak efficiency across a wide range of real world conditions for more of the time than traditional solar technologies. One major problem with conventional solar panels is that their efficiency drops off with every degree in temperature gained.

Heliatek’s solar technology, in contrast, is unique in that the efficiency of its organic photovoltaic modules remains constant up to 80°C. This is also the reason why Heliatek’s panels can be integrated onto the concrete without any need for ventilation.

Similarly, if the light intensity decreases, the efficiency of conventional solar panels decreases as well. Heliatek’s panels are consistently efficient from full sun down to a tenth of full sun, such as on a cloudy day or when not directly facing the sun, only receiving indirect light. Heliatek estimates that, under real world conditions, the combination of these two factors – temperature independence and superior low light performance – will increase the specific annual harvesting yield of its panels by 10-20 % compared to conventional solar panels, depending on the location and orientation of the PV façade system.

“Today, vertical walls are rarely used for solar energy gathering, despite the fact that the vertical building walls offer a much larger installation area than roof tops that are the focus of today’s solar building installations. Several factors such as unpleasant design, high system prices and limited performance potential are the reasons why vertical solar installations are not widespread,” explaijns Thibaud Le Séguillon, CEO of Heliatek, who goes on to say that integrating ultra-light, ultra-thin solar panels directly onto the blocks of the concrete façade, will cut installation costs along with the visual impact as the panels become a discrete part of the façade.

“Our organic solar technology ideally lends itself to gathering solar energy in a wide variety of lighting levels, even when cloudy or North facing, so that the whole building can become a green, energy-harvesting contributor to the global drive to reduce carbon footprint. It offers so many advantages over conventional solar panels that we believe that the RECKLI/Heliatek solar façade solution will rapidly become the application of choice for many architects once these products come to market in two years,” claims Le Séguillon.

Towards zero-energy  buildings

By 2020, an EU directive will require new buildings to be nearly zero-energy as part of the drive to be green and so, having every wall being an active producer of solar electricity will be a major contributor to achieving truly green buildings.

“We chose Heliatek as being key in our drive to low carbon, environmentally friendly products for two reasons. First, we are impressed by the effectiveness of their state-of-the-art, organic solar technology. Second, this solar technology has a truly green, zero environmental impact thanks to no toxic ingredients, non-toxic manufacturing with very little energy and material consumption, and ease of disposal as the modules are 99% PET plastic (the same plastic used in water bottles) with the rest also being harmless materials. These factors make Heliatek the first, completely green, solar technology, which is why we are incorporating it into our portfolio,” says Dr. Bernd Trompeter, Managing Director of RECKLI.

“Until now, architects have only had a limited choice of expensive and complex ways of adding solar harvesting to their building. This new BIOPV application will serve as a strong lever to start a new, truly green revolution in building design,” he adds

Architecturally, the new Heliatek and RECKLI solar concrete façade will offer several advantages. The solar cells are deposited on a thin, flexible, lightweight plastic sheet so that there are no safety issues unlike with glass modules, which require very secure handling and installation, so that they do not fall. At only 0.5 kilograms per square meter, compared to conventional panels at 10 to 15 kilograms per square meter, structural support issues are minimized. Aesthetically, the BIPV modules can be added to a building’s façade in non-intrusive ways and will be available in a variety of colors and dimensions to enable the architect to be creative with the external appearance of the building.

Heliatek uses a low temperature, roll-to-roll deposition process on plastic to manufacture solar panels, which will be highly cost competitive in mass production within a few years when the new solar façade modules will be available. The manufacturing technology is already in use in the OLED industry, providing Heliatek with proven, mass manufacturing machines and reliable processes that it can draw on to rapidly get to market with high volume production.

In December 2011, Heliatek set a new world record for organic solar cells after Fraunhofer ISE CalLab certified a cell efficiency of 9.8 % for a 1.1 cm² tandem cell manufactured with a low temperature deposition process. This new record makes the third time in a row that Heliatek has set a world record for efficiency in the field of organic photovoltaics.

For additional information:

Heliatek

Article source: http://www.renewableenergymagazine.com/energias/renovables/index/pag/pv_solar/colleft/colright/pv_solar/tip/articulo/pagid/19297/botid/71/

Legal Clash Over Solar Incentive Cuts In UK Heads To Supreme Court

The U.K.’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) is expected to formally file a Supreme Court appeal today challenging previous rulings that deemed its abrupt PV feed-in-tariff (FIT) cuts illegal.

On Jan. 25, the U.K.’s Court of Appeal had upheld the High Court’s ruling that the DECC’s FIT reductions – which, as originally announced, would slash the FIT rate for installations under 4 kW to 21 pence/kWh – did not go through proper review channels before being announced. The FIT cuts were immediately denounced by the local PV industry, and several firms mounted a successful legal challenge shortly thereafter.

Now, as was widely expected, the DECC will seek to bring the case before the Supreme Court.

“We respectfully disagree with the Court of Appeal’s decision on [FITs], and we have today lodged an application with the Supreme Court seeking that court’s permission to appeal,” the DECC said in a Feb. 21 announcement on its website. “We are now awaiting a decision of the Supreme Court on permission.”

Solarcentury, a U.K.-based PV system integrator that has led the industry’s legal protests against the FIT cuts, criticized the DECC’s latest appeal.

“Two weeks ago, ministers reassured the industry that they wanted to see 4 million solar homes in the U.K. by 2020,” said Solarcentury CEO Jeremy Leggett in a statement. “This appeal completely undermines that claim. They need to stop rewriting the scheme, end the constant stop-start, and provide long-term stability and meaningful returns for investors and customers.”

According to Leggett, if the DECC receives a favorable ruling in its appeal, a dangerous precedent could be set: The government would be permitted to “change feed-in tariffs whenever it chooses, even for projects that are already installed and supposedly guaranteed the feed-in tariff,” he said, adding that this instability would be detrimental to the country’s renewable energy industry.

However, both Leggett and Daniel Green, CEO of PV installation firm HomeSun, do not anticipate that the DECC will be successful in its latest appeal. In a statement, Green called the government’s position “an expensive lost cause.”

Regardless of the outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision, the damage has already been done, Green added. He cited recent numbers from the DECC showing a 90% reduction in solar PV installations over the last nine weeks compared to the nine weeks before Dec. 12, 2011.

The DECC has consistently defended its substantial FIT reductions as necessary in order to allow the incentive program to continue to function under changing market conditions.

“Without an urgent reduction in the current tariffs, which give a very generous return, the budget for the scheme would be severely depleted, and there would be very little available for future solar PV generators or for other technologies,” the agency said in a statement last month.

Article source: http://solarindustrymag.com/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.9750